Skip to main content
StudioDesign · synthesize · write
Prior research
DiscoverGraphTrends
Reading and organization tools
Paper ReaderMatrix
ActivitySettingsSign in
Review workbench
New review project
A connected research space for review articles
Autosaved after sign-in
Sign in

The review you had in mind.Written your way.

From your reading notes to the argument you shaped.

Start with my argumentSee how it comes together

Does diet soda really help with weight loss?

Published research example · Same evidence. Your argument.

ABE123
My judgment in the manuscript
Try a different argument

Papers & my appraisal

Supporting result

Greater loss with diet beverages

Randomized trial · 1 year · 303 participants
Habitual sweetened-beverage consumers
My writing goals in Studio
Review purpose

Explain why findings diverge

Synthesis approach

Compare by control and follow-up

My argument map

Explain why findings diverge
  1. 1

    Why do findings diverge?

    Participants · Attrition

    ASupportingBContrasting
    My notes connected
  2. 2

    Weight change by condition

    Supporting · Contrasting

    ASupportingBContrasting
  3. 3

    Scope and long-term maintenance

    Generalizability · Follow-up

    ASupportingBContrastingEFollow-up
Same sourcesABE

Retain contrary evidence and limits

My review manuscript

Example draft

Low/no-calorie sweetened drinks and weight management

Contents1. Why do findings diverge?2. Weight change by condition3. Scope and long-term maintenance
1. Why do findings diverge?

Divergent findings require joint appraisal of participant characteristics and attrition. Results in habitual consumers need care when generalized. [A, B]

2. Weight change by condition

The two trials differed in direction, even within weight-loss programs. [A, B]

3. Scope and long-term maintenance

Long-term interpretation should account for follow-up and participant retention. [A, B, E]

My appraisal → My argument → My judgment in the draftAn illustrative workflow, with no live AI calls.

A complete example. Enable JavaScript to play it and change the argument.

Explore each scene, from notes to manuscript
Notes & matrixArgumentManuscript

Every paper.Your critical perspective.

Compare the notes you made while reading, in each paper’s own appraisal column.

Does diet soda really help with weight loss?Published research example
Literature matrixPaperComparatorDesignResultMy appraisalAPeters 2016Only habitual consumers were recruited.Would this also apply to new consumers?BMadjd 2015These results cover 62 completers. Wouldincluding dropouts change the conclusion?CDELiterature matrixPaperMy appraisalAPeters2016Only habitual consumers wererecruited. Would this alsoapply to new consumers?BMadjd2015These results cover 62completers. Would includingdropouts change theconclusion?CD
08 / 08
Complete
Does diet soda really help with weight loss?. Compare the notes you made while reading, in each paper’s own appraisal column. Only habitual consumers were recruited. Would this also apply to new consumers? These results cover 62 completers. Would including dropouts change the conclusion?
1 / 3

The argumentis yours to shape.

Bring your question, synthesis approach and notes together. Then shape the structure.

Context first
My review · Diet soda & weight managementPublished research example
My Studio answersExplain why findings divergeCompare by control andfollow-upRetain contrary evidence andlimitsMy appraisal · AOnly habitual consumerswere recruited. Would thisalso apply to newconsumers?Diet soda &weight management1Why do findingsdiverge?Participants · Attrition2Weight change byconditionSupporting · Contrasting3Scope and long-termmaintenanceGeneralizability · Follow-upMy structureMy Studio answersExplain why findings divergeCompare by control and follow-upMy appraisal · AOnly habitual consumers were recruited.Would this also apply to new consumers?Diet soda &weight management1Why do findings diverge?Participants · Attrition2Weight change by conditionSupporting · Contrasting3Scope and long-term maintenanceGeneralizability · Follow-upMy structure
08 / 08
Complete
Does diet soda really help with weight loss?. Bring your question, synthesis approach and notes together. Then shape the structure. Why do findings diverge? → Weight change by condition → Scope and long-term maintenance
2 / 3

Your structure.In your manuscript.

Generate a manuscript from your chosen structure, then review how it reflects your ideas.

My review · Diet soda & weight managementPublished research example
My structure1. Why do findingsdiverge?2. Weight change bycondition3. Scope and long-termmaintenanceReview manuscript · Example draftLow/no-calorie sweetened drinksand weight managementDivergent results, context and limits1. Why do findings diverge?Divergent findings require jointappraisal of participantcharacteristics and attrition.[1, 2]2. Weight change by condition3. Scope and long-term maintenanceHabitual consumers onlyMy notes connectedMy structure1. Why do findings diverge?2. Weight change by condition3. Scope and long-termmaintenanceReview manuscript · Example draftLow/no-calorie sweeteneddrinks and weight managementDivergent results, context and limits1. Why do findings diverge?Divergent findings require jointappraisal of participantcharacteristics and attrition.[1, 2]2. Weight change by condition3. Scope and long-term maintenanceMy appraisal · AOnly habitual consumers were recruited.Would this also apply to new consumers?A draft shaped by my argument and notes
06 / 06
Complete
Does diet soda really help with weight loss?. Generate a manuscript from your chosen structure, then review how it reflects your ideas. Divergent findings require joint appraisal of participant characteristics and attrition.
3 / 3
Example sources

The familiar question leads into a review of low- and no-calorie sweetened beverages and weight management.

An illustrative workflow based on public literature. Notes and manuscript are examples. No live AI calls are made.

  • Peters et al. · 2016
  • Madjd et al. · 2015
  • McGlynn et al. · 2022
  • WHO · 2022
  • Harrold et al. · 2026

My appraisal

A. Only habitual consumers were recruited. Would this also apply to new consumers?

B. These results cover 62 completers. Would including dropouts change the conclusion?

My structure

  1. Why do findings diverge?
  2. Weight change by condition
  3. Scope and long-term maintenance

Review manuscript · Example draft

Divergent findings require joint appraisal of participant characteristics and attrition. [1, 2]

Results in habitual consumers need care when generalized. [1]

Long-term interpretation should account for follow-up and participant retention. [5]

Now, make it yours.

Let the thoughts you wrote down become the starting point.

Start with my argument

© 2026 Review Article Workbench
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

Research trends

Sign in to explore research trends

After signing in, use a question to compare consensus, differences, and research gaps across papers.

Checking sign-in methods…